android webview在系统签名文件下报错解决

通过查看以上源代码可以得知其实系统也是通过反射来创建的，返回值是一个WebViewFactoryProvider的类，可以看到系统会首先加载CHROMIUM_WEBVIEW_FACTORY，也就是使用Chrome内核的WebView。这个方法是静态的，那么我们就可以模仿一下

不二菜菜子

757人浏览 · 2022-09-21 13:49:08

不二菜菜子 · 2022-09-21 13:49:08 发布

最近定制系统应用开发用到了系统签名，有个功能用到了WebView这个控件，

正常不添加系统签名情况下WebView是正常的，添加系统签名后Webview崩溃报错：

Binary XML file line #46: Binary XML file line #46: Error inflating class android.webkit.WebView

详细看了下错误信息

发现这一行：

For security reasons, WebView is not allowed in privileged processes 出于安全原因，特权进程中不允许使用WebView

换句话说就是因为安全性问题系统级应用不允许使用WebView这个控件；

那么是为什么不允许在系统级应用使用呢？那么问题就来了；java嘛，面向Google编程。出事先Google,90%以上的问题都有先辈碰到过，实在没有再去翻源码，查原因；

随即Google 百度一番，得知原因

WebView这个控件在首次运行时会先调用getProvider()方法检测uid,如果是系统进程或者root进程，就直接抛出异常
为什么会有这种安全机制呢？因为WebView允许运行js，如果用户通过js注入，那么js就可以肆无忌惮的使用系统权限，
（系统级权限的APP不管要干嘛都可以无需做任何申请提示，可谓是为所欲为）这无疑是一个大漏洞，门户大开。

static WebViewFactoryProvider getProvider() {
        synchronized (sProviderLock) {
            // For now the main purpose of this function (and the factory abstraction) is to keep
            // us honest and minimize usage of WebView internals when binding the proxy.
            if (sProviderInstance != null) return sProviderInstance;
 
            final int uid = android.os.Process.myUid();
            if (uid == android.os.Process.ROOT_UID || uid == android.os.Process.SYSTEM_UID) {
                throw new UnsupportedOperationException(
                        "For security reasons, WebView is not allowed in privileged processes");
            }
 
            Trace.traceBegin(Trace.TRACE_TAG_WEBVIEW, "WebViewFactory.getProvider()");
            try {
                Trace.traceBegin(Trace.TRACE_TAG_WEBVIEW, "WebViewFactory.loadNativeLibrary()");
                loadNativeLibrary();
                Trace.traceEnd(Trace.TRACE_TAG_WEBVIEW);
 
                Class<WebViewFactoryProvider> providerClass;
                Trace.traceBegin(Trace.TRACE_TAG_WEBVIEW, "WebViewFactory.getFactoryClass()");
                try {
                    providerClass = getFactoryClass();
                } catch (ClassNotFoundException e) {
                    Log.e(LOGTAG, "error loading provider", e);
                    throw new AndroidRuntimeException(e);
                } finally {
                    Trace.traceEnd(Trace.TRACE_TAG_WEBVIEW);
                }
 
                StrictMode.ThreadPolicy oldPolicy = StrictMode.allowThreadDiskReads();
                Trace.traceBegin(Trace.TRACE_TAG_WEBVIEW, "providerClass.newInstance()");
                try {
                    try {
                        sProviderInstance = providerClass.getConstructor(WebViewDelegate.class)
                                .newInstance(new WebViewDelegate());
                    } catch (Exception e) {
                        sProviderInstance = providerClass.newInstance();
                    }
                    if (DEBUG) Log.v(LOGTAG, "Loaded provider: " + sProviderInstance);
                    return sProviderInstance;
                } catch (Exception e) {
                    Log.e(LOGTAG, "error instantiating provider", e);
                    throw new AndroidRuntimeException(e);
                } finally {
                    Trace.traceEnd(Trace.TRACE_TAG_WEBVIEW);
                    StrictMode.setThreadPolicy(oldPolicy);
                }
            } finally {
                Trace.traceEnd(Trace.TRACE_TAG_WEBVIEW);
            }
        }
    }

解决方法：

一：

如果是自编系统直接暴力改造系统framework层，直接干掉uid的判断；从根本上解决；

二：

从WebViewFactory这个类的GetProvider方法上看，在抛出异常之前有个判断，如果 sProviderInstance 等空就开始检测是不是在系统进程或者ROOT进程下运行

既然知道了有这一层判断，那么我们是否可以尝试通过模仿系统创建sProviderInstance一开始就手动构造个sProviderInstance 从而达到欺骗系统绕过这段检测呢？

看看系统是如何创建sProviderInstance的。这是getFactoryClass的源码

private static Class<WebViewFactoryProvider> getFactoryClass() throws ClassNotFoundException {
        Application initialApplication = AppGlobals.getInitialApplication();
        try {
            // First fetch the package info so we can log the webview package version.
            String packageName = getWebViewPackageName();
            sPackageInfo = initialApplication.getPackageManager().getPackageInfo(packageName, 0);
            Log.i(LOGTAG, "Loading " + packageName + " version " + sPackageInfo.versionName +
                          " (code " + sPackageInfo.versionCode + ")");
 
            // Construct a package context to load the Java code into the current app.
            Context webViewContext = initialApplication.createPackageContext(packageName,
                    Context.CONTEXT_INCLUDE_CODE | Context.CONTEXT_IGNORE_SECURITY);
            initialApplication.getAssets().addAssetPath(
                    webViewContext.getApplicationInfo().sourceDir);
            ClassLoader clazzLoader = webViewContext.getClassLoader();
            Trace.traceBegin(Trace.TRACE_TAG_WEBVIEW, "Class.forName()");
            try {
                return (Class<WebViewFactoryProvider>) Class.forName(CHROMIUM_WEBVIEW_FACTORY, true,
                                                                     clazzLoader);
            } finally {
                Trace.traceEnd(Trace.TRACE_TAG_WEBVIEW);
            }
        } catch (PackageManager.NameNotFoundException e) {
            // If the package doesn't exist, then try loading the null WebView instead.
            // If that succeeds, then this is a device without WebView support; if it fails then
            // swallow the failure, complain that the real WebView is missing and rethrow the
            // original exception.
            try {
                return (Class<WebViewFactoryProvider>) Class.forName(NULL_WEBVIEW_FACTORY);
            } catch (ClassNotFoundException e2) {
                // Ignore.
            }
            Log.e(LOGTAG, "Chromium WebView package does not exist", e);
            throw new AndroidRuntimeException(e);
        }
    }

public static void hookWebView() {
        int sdkInt = Build.VERSION.SDK_INT;
        try {
            Class<?> factoryClass = Class.forName("android.webkit.WebViewFactory");
            Field field = factoryClass.getDeclaredField("sProviderInstance");
            field.setAccessible(true);
            Object sProviderInstance = field.get(null);
            if (sProviderInstance != null) {
                log.debug("sProviderInstance isn't null");
                return;
            }
            Method getProviderClassMethod;
            if (sdkInt > 22) {
                getProviderClassMethod = factoryClass.getDeclaredMethod("getProviderClass");
            } else if (sdkInt == 22) {
                getProviderClassMethod = factoryClass.getDeclaredMethod("getFactoryClass");
            } else {
                log.info("Don't need to Hook WebView");
                return;
            }
            getProviderClassMethod.setAccessible(true);
            Class<?> providerClass = (Class<?>) getProviderClassMethod.invoke(factoryClass);
            Class<?> delegateClass = Class.forName("android.webkit.WebViewDelegate");
            Constructor<?> providerConstructor = providerClass.getConstructor(delegateClass);
            if (providerConstructor != null) {
                providerConstructor.setAccessible(true);
                Constructor<?> declaredConstructor = delegateClass.getDeclaredConstructor();
                declaredConstructor.setAccessible(true);
                sProviderInstance = providerConstructor.newInstance(declaredConstructor.newInstance());
                log.debug("sProviderInstance:{}", sProviderInstance);
                field.set("sProviderInstance", sProviderInstance);
            }
            log.debug("Hook done!");
        } catch (Throwable e) {
            log.error(e);
        }
    }

在使用WebView这个控件前也就是onCreate()方法调用setContentView()布局前，调用一次hookWebView()方法，手动创建个sProviderInstance对象，从而绕过系统的检测；解决系统签名下WebView不允许使用的限制，

我用的定制系统是6.0的，后续的高版本源码是否有无被修改过，暂时不得而知，后续有时间再去翻翻高版本的源代码；

来源：Android Webview在系统签名下会崩溃报错的解决方案_阿贾克斯`的博客-CSDN博客